Awhile back a surveyor commented on this forum about the need for a land surveyor requirement enforced by the planning agency or building department in accepting site plans. Rather than look for the thread I have opted to post the requirements for the City of Laguna Beach (same as Newport Beach) that I believe should be in every jurisdiction.
The attached site plan requirements clearly states the corners will be monumented and a record of survey or corner record filed with the county. Every surveyor should push their local jurisdiction to adopt similar requirements.
DWoolley
Site Plan Requirements by Ordinance or Policy
- DWoolley
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: Orange County
- Contact:
Site Plan Requirements by Ordinance or Policy
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- RAM
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
- Location: Central Cal Mountains
Re: Site Plan Requirements by Ordinance or Policy
I can see the need in urban areas on small lots, but not applicable in rural areas. I could not support that in my jurisdiction as a blanket requirement. If applied to parcel size and relative to min. setbacks, I could support but try telling the owner of 400 ac. they have to have a survey to prove a 500 foot building setback, na don't think so.
CA is not a one size fits all state. A lot of us work in feet not inches. We don't have curb and gutter, we don't have sidewalks, and the overall belief is less government is better.
As a public administrator who takes public complaints, I get it, we are here to protect the public. For some jurisdictions, yes good idea, for ALL, doesn't work.
CA is not a one size fits all state. A lot of us work in feet not inches. We don't have curb and gutter, we don't have sidewalks, and the overall belief is less government is better.
As a public administrator who takes public complaints, I get it, we are here to protect the public. For some jurisdictions, yes good idea, for ALL, doesn't work.
- Peter Ehlert
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:40 pm
- Location: N31°43', W116°39'
- Contact:
Re: Site Plan Requirements by Ordinance or Policy
RAM wrote:I can see the need in urban areas on small lots, but not applicable in rural areas. I could not support that in my jurisdiction as a blanket requirement. If applied to parcel size and relative to min. setbacks, I could support but try telling the owner of 400 ac. they have to have a survey to prove a 500 foot building setback, na don't think so.
CA is not a one size fits all state. A lot of us work in feet not inches. We don't have curb and gutter, we don't have sidewalks, and the overall belief is less government is better.
As a public administrator who takes public complaints, I get it, we are here to protect the public. For some jurisdictions, yes good idea, for ALL, doesn't work.
+1
Peter Ehlert
- hellsangle
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:31 am
- Location: Sonoma, CA
- LS_8750
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:36 pm
- Location: Sonoma
- Contact:
Re: Site Plan Requirements by Ordinance or Policy
+3
But also note that the $30 million tear down and rebuilds in Palo Alto in 130 year old neighborhoods, for example, are happening without the benefit of a record of survey...
At the discretion of the Planning Director........
But also note that the $30 million tear down and rebuilds in Palo Alto in 130 year old neighborhoods, for example, are happening without the benefit of a record of survey...
At the discretion of the Planning Director........
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests